Personal tools
 
Views

Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10)
November 4th: Community activity is high on Debate: Gene patents.

Argument: Affirmative Action actually enables the selection of highly qualified candidates that only appear less qualified due to their systemic exclusion

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate(s)

Extended argument and supporting evidence

Affirmative Action actually ensures that, on average, the best candidate is selected precisely because affirmative action systematically includes individuals from groups that are otherwise systematically excluded. That is, since individuals in such groups are — in the absence of affirmative action — systematically excluded, and since the groups are composed of individuals that are otherwise equal to others, such groups have a higher proportion of qualified candidates precisely because they are normally excluded. Therefore selecting candidates from the excluded groups yields, on average, a greater number of qualified individuals. Accordingly, the increased mathematical probability of generally selecting more qualified candidates from the groups targeted for affirmative action will decline as candidates are recruited from the targeted groups.

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.