Argument: The DC gun ban does not violate 2nd amendment because DC is not a state

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Debate Digest cue Popular debates Newest pages Categories Internships getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Contact Mailing list Twitter Facebook group interactions Donate! NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects Useful links National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10) November 4th: Community activity is high on Debate: Gene patents. Argument: The DC gun ban does not violate 2nd amendment because DC is not a state From Debatepedia Jump to: navigation, search [Edit] Parent Debate Should handguns be banned in Washington DC? [Edit] Supporting Evidence Major ruling against D.C. handgun ban In 2-1 vote, appeals court says Second Amendment is not limited to ‘militia’ "Judge Karen Henderson dissented, writing that the Second Amendment does not apply to the District of Columbia because it is not a state. " Retrieved from "http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_The_DC_gun_ban_does_not_violate_2nd_amendment_because_DC_is_not_a_state"

Problem with the site?

Parent Debate