Personal tools
 
Views

Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10)
November 4th: Community activity is high on Debate: Gene patents.

Argument: UN SC vetoes can be bypassed with "Uniting for Peace" Resolution

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Parent debate

Supporting evidence

  • Brendan I. Koerner. "Can You Bypass a U.N. Security Council Veto?". Slate.com. March 12, 2003 - "There's an esoteric maneuver to get around a threatened veto: invoking the obscure U.N. Resolution 377, also known as the "Uniting for Peace" Resolution. In early 1950, the United States pushed through the resolution as a means of circumventing possible Soviet vetoes. The measure states that, in the event that the Security Council cannot maintain international peace, a matter can be taken up by the General Assembly. This procedure has been used 10 times so far, most notably in 1956 to help resolve the Suez Canal crisis. Britain and France, which were occupying parts of the canal at the time, vetoed Security Council resolutions calling for their withdrawal. The United States called for an emergency "Uniting for Peace" session of the General Assembly, which passed a withdrawal resolution. (A simple majority vote is required.) Britain and France pulled out shortly after."

Counter-argument

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.