Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10)
Debate Digest Nov 19th: Medical marijuana. Next Debate Digest article: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts
Debate: Extraordinary rendition
From Debatepedia
|
[  ][  ][  ][  ][Edit] Is extraordinary rendition justified in fighting terrorism? |
|
[Edit] Background and context Extraordinary rendition is the apprehension and extrajudicial transfer of people from one jurisdiction to another without the necessary permission of a legal authority. The phrase is often used to describe the capture of terrorists by one country and his/her prosecution in another country without consulting the legal authority of the country where the terrorist was captured in. It is almost exclusively used in the United States of America. For example, the Abu Omar case is an example of extraordinary rendition. There has been criticism against the use of extraordinary rendition because evidence may be obtained illegally and violates the freedoms of people. See Wikipedia's article on extraordinary renditions for more background. |
|
[Edit] [  ][  ][  ][  ]US law: Do extraordinary renditions violate US law? | |
|
[  ][Edit] ProClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
[ ][Edit] ConClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
|
[Edit] [ ][ ][ ][ ][  ]International law: Do extraordinary renditions violate international law? | |
|
[ ][Edit] ProClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
[ ][Edit] ConClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
|
[Edit] [ ][ ][ ][ ]Write Subquestion here... | |
|
[ ][Edit] ProClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
[ ][Edit] ConClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
|
[Edit] See also[Edit] External links | |
