Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: High-speed rail

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search
[Digg]
[reddit]
[Delicious]
[Facebook]

What are the pros and cons of high-speed rail

Background and context

High speed rail is increasingly common around the world as a means of short and medium-range transportation. As such, it has also been subject to greater scrutiny by authorities and critics. For this reason, it is important to question to the pros and cons of high speed rail, versus the many alternatives, such as slower trains, buses, vehicles, and airplanes.

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]

Vs. air travel: How does high-speed rail compare to air travel?

[Add New]

Pro

  • High-speed train stations can be positioned near a city center. While the travel time by plane itself cannot be beaten by currently known high-speed trains, the airports usually lie rather far from cities (due to the noise created by aircrafts) and this increases the overall time needed for a trip. High-speed rail station, on the other hand, can be positioned in a city center, so for short- and even mid-range travels, high-speed rail could be actually faster than airplane.


[Add New]

Con

  • On long-range travels, air travel is faster High-speed rail is only a practical option in short and medium range trips. Airplanes are clearly superior for longer-range trips, and arguably in medium-to-long range trips.
  • Improving airport access is better than building high-speed rail. If the problem with airports is that they are too hard to get to, then access should be improved, with public transit such as light rail systems extending to the airport. This would cut the overall trip-time associated with air-travel, and would make high-speed transport less important.


[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Risks: What are the risks associated with high-speed rail?

[Add New]

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Add New]

Con

  • High-speed rail has greater risk of catastrophic accident. High speed rail, due to the extremely high speeds, is much more likely to result in a catastrophic accident in the event of some mistake and derailment. While fairly rare, the magnitude of the potential accident is a major risk surrounding high-speed rail. And, these risks don't simply apply to the passengers; they also apply to the companies building the rail systems, which may incur major legal liabilities and share-price setbacks from a major accident.



[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section up]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Pro

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Add New]

Con

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





See also

External links and resources:


Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.