Debate: Is Intelligent Design a legitimate scientific theory?

[]

[]

[]

[]

Is Intelligent Design a legitimate scientific theory?

Background and context

[]

[]

[]

[]

Write Subquestion here...

[]

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

[]

No

• Intelligent design does not restrict itself to scientific observation

• Intelligent design cannot be scientifically tested

• Intelligent design offers no scientific, predictive value

• Intelligent design closes scientific inquiry

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

Write Subquestion here...

[]

Yes

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

[]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here

[]

[]

[]

[]

Write Subquestion here...

[]

Yes

• "The Science Behind Intelligent Design Theory". Intelligent Design and Evolution Awareness Center. Retrieved 1.30.08

[]

No

• Richard Olmstead. "Intelligent Design not science". Seattle PI. August 17, 2005
• Nicole Winfield, Associated Press. "Vatican Astronomer: Intelligent Design is Not Science". Live Science. November 18, 2005
• Penny Higgins. "Why 'Intelligent Design' (ID) is not science, and why, therefore, it should not be taught in a science curriculum". Retrieved 1.30.08
• "Claim CI001: Intelligent design theory is science." The Talk Origins Archive.
• "Why 'Intelligent Design' (ID) is not science." Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal. Retrieved 1.30.08

External links