Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10)
Debate Digest Nov 24th: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts | Ruffles50 has been working on Ban on smoking on public places
Debate: Non-interventionism
From Debatepedia
|
[Edit] Is non-interventionism a good policy? |
|
[Edit] Background and context:There are many situations in which there are many good reasons to intervene in the internal development of other countries. These include economic crises, genocides and human rights violations, environmental damage, natural disasters, etc. Can, even in these cases, the non-interventionism be a sound policy? |
|
[Edit] [ ]Economics: Is non-interventionism better than interventionism? | |
|
[Edit] Pro
|
[Edit] Con
|
|
[Edit] [ ]State sovereignty: Is it unjust to intervene? | |
|
[Edit] Pro
|
[Edit] Con |
|
[Edit] [ ]Politics: Is it better not to intervene? | |
|
[Edit] ProClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
[Edit] Con
|
|
[Edit] [ ]Environment: Are environmental law enforcements unjust? | |
|
[Edit] ProClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
[Edit] ConClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
|
[Edit] [ ]Humanitarian crises: Is it justifiable not to intervene? | |
|
[Edit] ProClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
[Edit] ConClick on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here
|
|
[Edit] See also
[Edit] External links | |




]




