Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10)
Debate Digest Nov 19th: Medical marijuana. Next Debate Digest article: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts
User contributions
From Debatepedia
(Newest | Oldest) View (Newer 50) (Older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).
- 18:56, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Pro) (top)
- 18:55, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Pro)
- 18:51, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Argument: Fear of using civilian courts cowers to terrorists (→Supporting quotations) (top)
- 18:50, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Argument: Trying terrorists in NYC restores US rule of law (→Supporting quotations) (top)
- 18:48, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Pro)
- 18:37, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Argument: Terrorist suspects are particularly dangerous to guards (→Supporting quotations) (top)
- 18:35, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Argument: Terrorist trials present broad safety hazard to surrounding area (→Supporting quotations) (top)
- 18:28, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Argument: Civilian trial of terrorists risks acquittal, hung jury (→Supporting quotations) (top)
- 18:18, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Con)
- 17:51, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Argument: Wrong to give some terrorists civilian trials and not others (→Supporting quotations) (top)
- 17:48, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Argument: Trying terrorists risks releasing intelligence, costing lives (→Supporting quotations) (top)
- 17:41, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Con)
- 17:39, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) General statements against trying terrorists in civilian courts (top)
- 17:33, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Con)
- 17:32, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Con)
- 17:25, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Pro)
- 17:24, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Argument: Fear of using civilian courts cowers to terrorists (→Supporting quotations)
- 17:13, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:Renergy (Hey) (top)
- 17:02, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Paper books vs electronic books (→Write debate main question here...) (top)
- 17:00, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate Digest cue (→Priority rankings for Debate Digest) (top)
- 16:59, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Paper books vs electronic books
- 15:54, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→See also)
- 15:50, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Argument: Tribunals for terrorists is consistent with US Constitution (top)
- 15:47, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Vs. military tribunals: Would civilian courts better than military tribunals?)
- 15:42, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Con)
- 15:41, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Argument: Terrorists should not be given privileges of civilian courts (→Supporting quotations) (top)
- 15:41, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Argument: Terrorists should not be given privileges of civilian courts
- 15:28, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Con)
- 15:26, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Con)
- 17:34, 22 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Pro)
- 17:33, 22 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Argument: Trying terrorists in NYC restores US rule of law (→Supporting quotations)
- 16:36, 22 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate Digest cue (→Priority rankings for Debate Digest)
- 16:33, 22 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate Digest cue (→Priority rankings for Debate Digest)
- 16:29, 22 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate Digest cue (→Priority rankings for Debate Digest)
- 23:23, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Argument: Trials of 9/11 terrorists in NYC will become a circus
- 23:21, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Con)
- 23:20, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Con)
- 23:14, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Pro)
- 23:14, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Argument: The law is blind to terrorist wishes to by tried in NYC (top)
- 23:11, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Pro)
- 23:09, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Con)
- 22:57, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Argument: Terrorist suspects are particularly dangerous to guards
- 22:52, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Con)
- 22:48, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Con)
- 22:47, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Con)
- 18:13, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Pro/con sources)
- 18:13, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Argument: Trying terrorists in NYC restores US rule of law (→Supporting quotations)
- 18:07, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Pro)
- 17:44, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Argument: Trying terrorists shows confidence in US system and ideals (→Supporting quotations) (top)
- 17:35, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Debate: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts (→Pro)
(Newest | Oldest) View (Newer 50) (Older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).
