Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10)
Debate Digest Nov 19th: Medical marijuana. Next Debate Digest article: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts
New pages
From Debatepedia
Showing below up to '''50''' results starting with #'''1'''.
View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).
- 17:39, 23 November 2009 General statements against trying terrorists in civilian courts (hist) [858 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 16:59, 23 November 2009 Debate: Paper books vs electronic books (hist) [2,824 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 15:50, 23 November 2009 Argument: Tribunals for terrorists is consistent with US Constitution (hist) [2,957 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 15:41, 23 November 2009 Argument: Terrorists should not be given privileges of civilian courts (hist) [1,563 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 12:07, 23 November 2009 Debate: Particle colliders (hist) [3,585 bytes] Renergy (Talk | contribs)
- 01:19, 23 November 2009 Debate: Reality shows (hist) [2,836 bytes] Renergy (Talk | contribs)
- 20:53, 22 November 2009 Debate: Pros and cons of drinking wine (hist) [2,890 bytes] Renergy (Talk | contribs)
- 23:23, 21 November 2009 Argument: Trials of 9/11 terrorists in NYC will become a circus (hist) [1,180 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 23:14, 21 November 2009 Argument: The law is blind to terrorist wishes to by tried in NYC (hist) [619 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 22:57, 21 November 2009 Argument: Terrorist suspects are particularly dangerous to guards (hist) [1,602 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 17:35, 21 November 2009 Argument: Military tribunals are a propaganda win for terrorists (hist) [1,615 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 06:57, 21 November 2009 Argument: Trying terrorists shows confidence in US system and ideals (hist) [1,185 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 05:00, 21 November 2009 Argument: Fear of using civilian courts cowers to terrorists (hist) [1,952 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 00:52, 21 November 2009 Argument: Trying terrorists in NYC restores US rule of law (hist) [6,437 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 00:31, 21 November 2009 Debate: Eliminating US military base in Okinawa (hist) [2,981 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 00:20, 21 November 2009 Debate: US ban on travel to Cuba (hist) [3,067 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 00:04, 21 November 2009 Argument: Terrorist trials won't make US greater target than already (hist) [1,402 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 23:59, 20 November 2009 Argument: Courtroom rants of terrorists only expose them as hateful fools (hist) [1,068 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 23:29, 20 November 2009 Argument: Civilian trials improve global opinion of US, fight on terrorism (hist) [2,724 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 22:31, 20 November 2009 Argument: US courts have successfully tried many terrorists (hist) [3,520 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 21:33, 20 November 2009 Argument: Military tribunals have performed poorly versus civilian courts (hist) [1,848 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 21:15, 20 November 2009 Argument: Wrong to give some terrorists civilian trials and not others (hist) [2,802 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 21:10, 20 November 2009 Argument: Trying terrorists risks releasing intelligence, costing lives (hist) [2,548 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 20:57, 20 November 2009 Argument: Trying terrorists in NYC invites a terrorist attack (hist) [828 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 16:42, 20 November 2009 Argument: Trying terrorists in NYC offers stage for grand-standing (hist) [1,598 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 16:25, 20 November 2009 Argument: Terrorist trials present broad safety hazard to surrounding area (hist) [1,440 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 16:20, 20 November 2009 Argument: NYC civilian trial re-open wounds of 9/11 victims (hist) [1,530 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 16:08, 20 November 2009 Argument: Civilian trial of terrorists risks acquittal, hung jury (hist) [4,284 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 15:33, 20 November 2009 Argument: KSM will almost certainly be convicted in NY civilian courts (hist) [5,428 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 15:10, 20 November 2009 Debate: Trying terrorist suspects in civilian courts (hist) [2,921 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 17:07, 19 November 2009 Argument: Trials far terrorists should not be held until after conflict (hist) [726 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 16:17, 19 November 2009 Debate: Is the movie "Rabbit-proof fence" a good adaptation of the book? (hist) [3,458 bytes] Meyerjr (Talk | contribs)
- 03:50, 19 November 2009 Debate: Trying 9/11 suspects in New York (hist) [45,056 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 21:08, 18 November 2009 Argument: Marijuana is a good alternative medicine to suit individual needs (hist) [646 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 19:31, 18 November 2009 Argument: Legalizing medical marijuana is not legalizing recreational use (hist) [864 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 18:15, 18 November 2009 Argument: Medical marijuana will be abused by druggies (hist) [1,080 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 18:09, 18 November 2009 Argument: Allowing medical marijuana shows compassion to the suffering (hist) [1,163 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 15:40, 18 November 2009 Debate: Should we eat fast food? (hist) [2,774 bytes] Meyerjr (Talk | contribs)
- 23:13, 17 November 2009 Argument: Smoking marijuana is more damaging than taking chemical parts (hist) [2,645 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 18:31, 17 November 2009 Argument: Marijuana is a safer alternative to many medications (hist) [4,117 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 17:30, 17 November 2009 Argument: Evidence is too inconclusive on medicinal value of marijuana (hist) [2,205 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 13:07, 17 November 2009 Debate: economic and financial crimes rampant (hist) [2,855 bytes] Twister (Talk | contribs)
- 03:58, 17 November 2009 Debate: Are magazines marketed for teenagers a bad influence? (hist) [2,855 bytes] Monkeymae1222 (Talk | contribs)
- 03:25, 17 November 2009 Argument: State should not override decisions of doctors on marijuana (hist) [4,857 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 02:00, 17 November 2009 Argument: Smoking marijuana is generally very unhealthy (hist) [2,988 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 01:54, 17 November 2009 Argument: Marijuana is not an effective drug for treating illnesses (hist) [2,411 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 01:35, 17 November 2009 Argument: Unhealthy effects of Marijuana outweigh medical benefits (hist) [1,539 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 23:35, 16 November 2009 Argument: There are less dangerous, equally effective alternatives to marijuana (hist) [5,643 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 23:14, 16 November 2009 General statements against medical marijuana (hist) [6,555 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
- 22:58, 16 November 2009 General statements in favor of medical marijuana (hist) [7,630 bytes] Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
