Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10)
Debate Digest Nov 19th: Medical marijuana. Next Debate Digest article: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts
Argument: The US needs a diversity of energy sources involving green energy AND ANWR oil
From Debatepedia
Argument's parent debate
Argument summary
KYLE & CO. WILL LOSE THE DEBATE (maybe not) It would be imprudent to invest strictly in green energy now. The reality is that a diversity of energy resources is needed today as we transition in the long-run (not the short-medium term) to greener energy. The reality of the US dependence on oil cannot be denied, and this dependence will continue for some time, and will decline only at a slow, long-term rate. This makes it important to continue to invest in oil exploration and drilling domestically and abroad.
This will not discourage long-term investments in green energy. Green energy investments are driven by economic incentives as much as the fight against global warming. The economic incentives will not disappear with drilling in ANWR. Indeed, ANWR is not a massive oil resource capable of dramatically affecting global oil prices. Therefore, price pressures against oil consumption and favoring green energy will continue to mount, and ANWR's opening to drilling will have no impact on the long-term trend toward clean alternatives. Supporting this prediction, Morgan Stanley predicted in 2007 that due in part to high oil prices, the global sale of green energy products could reach one trillion by 2030.[1] ANWR oil resources cannot have a dramatic impact on these kinds of trends. Opening ANWR, in this way, is not really going to "perpetuate the addiction to oil", as the trend away from that addiction is a foregone conclusion.
Supporting evidence, quotes, analysis
Counter-arguments
- Job-creation would be better achieved by investing in green energy
- Added oil supply from ANWR would be a "drop in the bucket" for US consumption
- The relative insignificance of ANWR oil supplies makes it a poor means to reducing US foreign oil dependencies
- Drilling in ANWR would have a negligible effect on oil prices
Counter-point
- None of the above counter-arguments address the notion that ANWR would help DIVERSIFY TO SOME DEGREE the US energy sources portfolio. While it may be a "drop in the bucket", that doesn't negate the notion that it is, in fact, a "drop" that has value and could be worth extracting.
