Argument: Carbon taxes are economically costly

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Debate Digest cue Popular debates Newest pages Categories Internships getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Contact Mailing list Twitter Facebook group interactions Donate! NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects Useful links National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10) Debate Digest Nov 19th: Medical marijuana. Next Debate Digest article: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts Argument: Carbon taxes are economically costly From Debatepedia Revision as of 06:02, 10 September 2008; Brooks Lindsay (Talk \| contribs) (diff) ←Older revision \| Current revision \| Newer revision→ (diff) Jump to: navigation, search [Edit] Parent debates Debate:Carbon tax Debate:Carbon Emissions, Cap-and-trade versus Carbon Tax [Edit] Supporting quotations "Carbon tax to hit miners", The Australian, 2/5/07 - "A $25 per tonne carbon tax would cost the state's alumina industry more than $200 million a year."[1] Retrieved from "http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_Carbon_taxes_are_economically_costly"

Problem with the site?

Parent debates