Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10)
Debate Digest Nov 19th: Medical marijuana. Next Debate Digest article: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts
Argument: Nation states that "own" natural resources are more accountable to protecting those resources
From Debatepedia
Revision as of 03:27, 9 January 2008; Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
[Edit]
Parent debate
[Edit]
Supporting evidence
- "Problems of the Global Commons". The Australian APEC study center. Richard Snape and Don Gunasekera. 1997 - "When property rights to natural resources are non-existent or unenforced no individual bears the full cost of his or her action, and there is no defined mechanism for regulating the use of the resources. The result can be overexploitation— overfishing, overgrazing, excessive extraction of groundwater, and overuse of the commons are examples."
