Argument: Plea bargaining reduces costs by reducing lengthy trials - Debatepedia

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

Personal tools

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Debate Digest cue Popular debates Newest pages Categories Internships getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Contact Mailing list Twitter Facebook group interactions Donate! NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects Useful links National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10) Debate Digest Nov 19th: Medical marijuana. Next Debate Digest article: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts Argument: Plea bargaining reduces costs by reducing lengthy trials From Debatepedia Revision as of 16:57, 11 September 2009; Lenkahabetinova (Talk \| contribs) (diff) ←Older revision \| Current revision \| Newer revision→ (diff) Jump to: navigation, search [Edit] Argument's parent debate Resolved: In the United States, plea bargaining in exchange for testimony is unjust [Edit] Supporting evidence Israel, Jerold H. King, Nancy J, LaFave, Wayne R. Principles Of Criminal Procedure: Post Investigation Concise Hornbook: Discusses the principles of criminal law underpinning the US criminal justice system, and defends the practice of plea bargaining on the basis of limited state resources and a backed up judicial system. Purpura, Phillip. Criminal Justice: An Introduction: Book defends plea bargaining on the basis that it saves state resources. [Edit] Counter argument Retrieved from "http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_Plea_bargaining_reduces_costs_by_reducing_lengthy_trials"

Problem with the site?

.