Argument: Plea bargains in exchange testimony help convict the worst criminals and protect society

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Debate Digest cue Popular debates Newest pages Categories Internships getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Contact Mailing list Twitter Facebook group interactions Donate! NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects Useful links National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10) Debate Digest Nov 19th: Medical marijuana. Next Debate Digest article: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts Argument: Plea bargains in exchange testimony help convict the worst criminals and protect society From Debatepedia Jump to: navigation, search [Edit] Argument's parent debate Resolved: In the United States, plea bargaining in exchange for testimony is unjust [Edit] Supporting evidence Madinger, John. Confidential Informant: Law Enforcements Most Valuable Tool. CRC Press, 1999. The book discusses how many criminals are caught through plea bargaining in exchange for testimony and argues that this helps protects society. [Edit] Counter arguments Retrieved from "http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_Plea_bargains_in_exchange_testimony_help_convict_the_worst_criminals_and_protect_society"

Problem with the site?

Argument's parent debate