Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10)
Debate Digest Nov 24th: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts | Ruffles50 has been working on Ban on smoking on public places
Argument: Plea bargains involve sufficient due process
From Debatepedia
Revision as of 16:45, 11 September 2009; Lenkahabetinova (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
YOU CAN BECOME AN EDITOR OF THIS PAGE. DEBATEPEDIA IS A WIKI THAT ANYONE CAN EDIT! BE BOLD, CLICK EDIT, AND HELP MAKE THIS PAGE INTO A VALUABLE PUBLIC RESOURCE THAT THOUSANDS WILL READ. SEE THE GETTING STARTED TUTORIAL.
[Edit]
Argument's parent debate
[Edit]
Supporting evidence
- Debra Emmelman. "Trial by Plea Bargain: Case Settlement as a Product of Recursive Decisionmaking". Law & Society Review, Vol. 30, No. 2. (1996) - "Viewed as a component of recursive decisionmaking, plea bargaining can be seen as including multiple episodes of negotiating behavior as well as a wide range of litigation proceedings. Perhaps most important, plea bargaining and trial can actually be seen to converge: not only are plea bargain negotiations "rehearsals of scenes that participants would be willing to portray before a jury" (Maynard 1984b:114), but pretrial and trial proceedings are oftentimes precursors for case settlement."[1]
