Argument: Resolving a case quickly by plea bargaining relieves undue stress to the defendant - Debatepedia

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

Personal tools

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Debate Digest cue Popular debates Newest pages Categories Internships getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Contact Mailing list Twitter Facebook group interactions Donate! NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects Useful links National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10) Debate Digest Nov 19th: Medical marijuana. Next Debate Digest article: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts Argument: Resolving a case quickly by plea bargaining relieves undue stress to the defendant From Debatepedia Revision as of 19:01, 11 September 2009; Lenkahabetinova (Talk \| contribs) (diff) ←Older revision \| Current revision \| Newer revision→ (diff) Jump to: navigation, search [Edit] Argument's parent debate Resolved: In the United States, plea bargaining in exchange for testimony is unjust [Edit] Supporting evidence Criminal Lawyers and Procedure. "Defendants' Incentives for Accepting Plea Bargains." Retrieved 10.24.07 - "Resolving the matter quickly. This has the intangible benefit, touched on above, of providing resolution to the stress of being charged with a crime. Going to trial usually requires a much longer wait -- and causes much more stress -- than taking a plea bargain." [Edit] Counter-arguments Retrieved from "http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_Resolving_a_case_quickly_by_plea_bargaining_relieves_undue_stress_to_the_defendant"

Problem with the site?

.