Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10)
Debate Digest Nov 19th: Medical marijuana. Next Debate Digest article: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts
Argument: Under a "veil of ignorance", the unborn would adopt a pro-life social contract
From Debatepedia
Revision as of 17:21, 26 May 2008; Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
[Edit]
Parent debate
[Edit]
Supporting quotations
A unsourced bumper sticker - "Now that I'm born I'M Pro-Choice"
- This reflects the gist of this argument. If people were to decide before they were born what kind of social contract they would adopt, they wold certainly not adopt a pro-choice social contract. Only once they are born is it plausible that someone would willingly adopt a pro-choice position ("now that I'm born I'M pro-Choice"). But, the "veil of ignorance", a liberal philosophical supposition, does not allow for this. The social contract must fit with what we would adopt before being born. This would, obviously, have to be a pro-life social contract.
