Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: Ban on battlefield lasers

From Debatepedia

Revision as of 00:27, 6 May 2009; Brooks Lindsay (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
[Digg]
[reddit]
[Delicious]
[Facebook]

Should lasers on the battle field be banned internationally?

Contents

Background and Context of Debate:

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]

Effects: Are lasers egregiously harmful to soldiers?

[Add New]

Yes

  • Laser-induced blindness is severe and cannot be cured.



[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

History: Does history indicate that lasers should be banned?

[Add New]

Yes

  • Lasers should be banned like blinding gases were banned after WWI. "Ban cruel laser weapons' says Red Cross". New Scientist. 19 Nov. 1994 - "SEVENTY years after the spectre of soldiers blinded by gas during the First World War led to an international ban on chemical weapons, the Red Cross is campaigning for a ban on the use of battlefield lasers to blind the enemy. This time around, says Louise Doswald-Beck, a senior legal adviser to the Red Cross, it should not take a practical demonstration of the effects to convince nations that they should be banned."


[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section up]

Pro/con resources

[Add New]

Yes



[Add New]

No

Click on the pencil icon and research and write arguments here





External links

Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.