Personal tools
 
Views

Debate: War on Drugs

From Debatepedia

Jump to: navigation, search
[Digg]
[reddit]
[Delicious]
[Facebook]

Is the American War on Drugs succeeding or should it be abandoned?

Background and context

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]

Supply/demand/prices: Has the War on Drugs reduced the supply of illegal drugs?

[Add New]

Yes

  • The War on Drugs has caused the price of many illicit drugs to increase - This is seen as a sign of success because it suggests that the supply of drugs has diminished as a result of such things as coca field eradication in Columbia. In general, the diminished supply of a good makes the good more scarce and more valuable or expensive on the market. Since the price of cocaine has increased, therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that a decrease in supply is the result.



[Add New]

No

It is not working, only increasing the value. Illegal drugs are just as easy, if not easier to get now then ten years ago. The price may have gone up, but only due to greed. Prison sentencing may have contributed to the raise of price. The statistics shown are usually wrong or falsified to protect a certain agencies source of income. This goes right along with the increase in arrest. They have to show their doing something.

[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Imprisonment: Is the imprisonment rate in the War on Drugs justifiable?

[Add New]

Yes

[Add New]

No

  • The incarceration rate in America's war on drugs is excessive and costly. Between 1983 and 1998, annual drug admissions to state and federal prisons increased approximately 16-fold to about 170,000.[1] Mike Gravel. 2006 - "The United States incarcerates more people and at a higher rate than any other peacetime nation in the world. According to the federal Bureau of Justice Statistics the number of US residents behind bars has now reached more than 2.3 million. We are losing an entire generation of young men and women to our prisons. Our nation's ineffective and wasteful 'war on drugs' plays a major role in this. We must place a greater emphasis on rehabilitation and prevention. We must de-criminalize minor drug offenses and increase the availability and visibility of substance abuse treatment and prevention in our communities as well as in jails and prisons."



[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Civil liberties: Are civil liberties protected adequately in the War on Drugs?

[Add New]

Yes

[Add New]

No


[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Youth drug problems:

[Add New]

Yes

Just becuase youth are under 21, this doesn't mean they should have priveleges of getting away with crimes. Drugs are illegal and they should be punished equally for using them.

If they are not punished, then they'll keep using them even though they probably know they are bad for them.



[Add New]

No

  • Youth and students with drug problems should be helped off of their addictions, not punished.
    • Scarlett Swerdlow, Executive Director of Students for Sensible Drug Policy (SSDP) said in 2005[2] - "Half of all high school seniors graduating this year have tried illegal drugs at some point. More than eight in ten say it’s easy for them to get their hands on marijuana. Drug policies should take this reality into account and respond sensibly. But instead, the Drug Czar wants to alienate students who have problems with drugs by arresting them, kicking them out of extracurricular activities, and taking away their financial aid for college."



[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Write Subquestion here...

[Add New]

Yes


[Add New]

No


[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section down]
[Move subquestion section up]

Leaders/politicians: Where do the primary leaders and politicians stands?

[Add New]

Yes

  • Bush administration.
  • Drug Czar John Walters,
  • Robert Novak, architect of Plan Columbia.


[Add New]

No



[Edit]
[Delete Subquestion section]
[Add new subquestion section]
[Move subquestion section up]

Organizations pro and con:

[Add New]

Yes

  • Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) - Cited increase in cocaine prices in 2006 as evidence of success.[3]



[Add New]

No

  • Drug Policy Alliance.
  • Government Accountability Office.
  • Students for Sensible Drug Policy.
  • DrugWarRant.com
  • Human Rights Watch, opposes the War on Drugs largely on the basis of the incarceration costs.



See also

External links


Problem with the site? 

Tweet a bug on bugtwits
.