Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10)
Debate Digest Nov 19th: Medical marijuana. Next Debate Digest article: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts
Plea bargaining violates the legal notion of due desert
From Debatepedia
YOU CAN BECOME AN EDITOR OF THIS PAGE. DEBATEPEDIA IS A WIKI THAT ANYONE CAN EDIT! BE BOLD, CLICK EDIT, AND HELP MAKE THIS PAGE INTO A VALUABLE PUBLIC RESOURCE THAT THOUSANDS WILL READ. SEE THE GETTING STARTED TUTORIAL.
[Edit]
Argument's parent debate
[Edit]
Supporting evidence
- Ashworth, Andrew. "Sentencing and Criminal Justice" (Law in Context) - Argues that the practice of plea bargaining unjustly creates an avenue for criminals to be punished less severely than they deserve, contradicting the notion of "due desert" or proportional punishment.
- Cahill, Michael T, and Robinson, Paul H. Law Without Justice, How Criminal Law Doesn’t Give People What They Are Due.: Argues in several chapters that plea bargaining violates due desert.
[Edit]



