Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10)
Debate Digest Nov 19th: Medical marijuana. Next Debate Digest article: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts
Debate: AIG bonuses
From Debatepedia
(List of links)
< Debate: AIG bonusesThe following pages link to Debate: AIG bonuses:
View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).- Past Debate Digest topics
- Past featured editors
- Debate: AIG bonuses after bailout (redirect page)
- Argument: Most AIG employees are blameless and earned bonuses
- Argument: Bonuses controversy wrongly scapegoats AIG employees
- Argument: AIG is obligated by contract with employees to give bonuses
- Argument: Bonuses help AIG keep employees and survive
- Argument: Violating AIG contracts undermines contracts generally
- Argument: AIG bonus contracts are invalidated by taxpayer bailout
- Argument: AIG bonuses are an insult to suffering taxpayers
- Argument: Taxes should not be used to punish AIG
- Argument: Punishing AIG bonuses only caters to populist anger
- Argument: AIG was bailed out by taxpayers; bonuses are wrong
- Argument: AIG bonuses would not have been possible without bailout
- Argument: Taxpayer bailout of AIG justifies government control
- Argument: AIG bonuses reward those responsible for collapse
- Argument: AIG bonuses are insignificant relative to larger problems
- Argument: Supporters of AIG bailout can't complain about bonuses
- Argument: AIG bonus contracts, like all contracts, are subject to change
- Argument: Failure of employees/execs at AIG invalidates bonus contracts
- Argument: Punishing AIG undermines business relations with government
- Argument: $165 million AIG bonuses is not chump change
