Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10)
Debate Digest Nov 19th: Medical marijuana. Next Debate Digest article: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts
Debate: Abstinence-only vs. comprehensive sex education
From Debatepedia
(List of links)
< Debate: Abstinence-only vs. comprehensive sex educationThe following pages link to Debate: Abstinence-only vs. comprehensive sex education:
View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).- Debate: Sex Education, Abolition of (UK)
- Debate: Condoms in schools
- Debate: Sex education
- Past Debate Digest topics
- Debate: "Abstinence only" policy (redirect page)
- Debate:Abstinence only AIDS prevention (redirect page)
- Debate: Abstinence only sex education (redirect page)
- Argument: Teaching abstinence saves taxpayers money
- Argument: Abstinence-only effectively reduces rates of teen sex and pregnancy
- Argument: Abstinence-only is not effective at reducing teen sex rates
- Argument: Abstinence-only discourages condom-use, increases risks
- Argument: Sex-ed empowers informed decisions about risks of sex
- Argument: Abstinence may be effective, but teens will never follow it
- Argument: Abstinence-only is too expensive for so few results
- Argument: Comprehensive sex-ed acknowledges some teens will have sex
- Argument: Abstinence may have value, but only within comprehensive sex-ed
- Argument: Abstinence-only correctly responds to an epidemic of STDs
- Argument: Abstinence-only helps youth avoid emotional damage of sex
- Argument: Abstinence-only discourages youth sex and risk-taking
- Argument: Virginity pledge programs are an effective form of abstinence-only
- Argument: Comprehensive sex-ed does not reduce STDs in teens
- Argument: Comprehensive sex ed fosters an irresponsible sexual culture
- Argument: Abstinence-only provides some info on STDs and contraception
- Argument: Comprehensive sex-ed often ignores abstinence as an option
- Argument: Comprehensive sex-ed often actually encourages sex
- Argument: Parents prefer more modest abstinence-only sex-ed
- Argument: Abstinence-only does not help decrease HIV infection rates
- Argument: Abstinence-only presumes pregnancy out-of-wedlock is always wrong
- Argument: Parents, not schools, should teach kids about sex
- Argument: Abstinence-only wrongly bashes all non-marital sex
