Debate: Ban on human reproductive cloning - Debatepedia

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

Personal tools

	Views Special Page
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Debate Digest cue Popular debates Newest pages Categories Internships getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Contact Mailing list Twitter Facebook group interactions Donate! NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects Useful links National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox Upload file Special pages	Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10) Debate Digest Nov 19th: Medical marijuana. Next Debate Digest article: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts Debate: Ban on human reproductive cloning From Debatepedia (List of links) Jump to: navigation, search < Debate: Ban on human reproductive cloning The following pages link to Debate: Ban on human reproductive cloning: View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 \| 50 \| 100 \| 250 \| 500). Debate:Human Cloning (redirect page) Argument: Cloning is in this respect no different from any other new medical technology Argument: If women have a right to reproduce, society can't say "not by cloning" Argument: Cloning is more predictable than natural reproduction Argument: Cloning-reproduction would never compete with sex-reproduction Argument: Human cloning would enable infertile couples to have children Argument: Opponents of cloning must tolerate the practice Argument: Moral arguments against cloning are unfair to future human clones Argument: Deformed clones would still be happy to be alive Argument: Medical advancements once feared are now accepted; cloning is the same Argument: Opponents exaggerate the impact that cloning will have on the world Argument: Human cloning may enable rejuvenation and the reversing of aging Argument: Human cloning technology could be used to reverse heart attacks Argument: Cloning can produce new cells (and organs) to replace dead ones Argument: Cloning can be used in breast implants, eliminating risks of silicon Argument: Cloning is ethical in exceptional circumstances, so should always be legal Argument: People can create clones to lead the lives they wanted for themselves Argument: People can create clones to be ideal, twin-like companions Argument: Cloning allows gay couples to have children of their own blood Argument: Opponents of cloning will have to deny the sick that request it Argument: Cloning will likely lead to major medical advancements/save lives Argument: Cloning does not xerox an individual; all individuals become unique Argument: Cloned babies would be loved by parents that choose to have them Argument: Human clones will not reduce human biological diversity Argument: Cloned humans have a soul and are ordinary humans in every way Argument: Artificial wombs are impossible to grow Argument: People want to clone humans for their organs Argument: Clones are not good or bad; they have the potential to be either Argument: Parental motives can't be used against cloning and not normal child-rearing Argument: Opposition to human cloning existed to advance therapeutic cloning Debate:Banning Human Cloning (redirect page) Debate: Therapeutic cloning Debate:Banning Human Reproductive Cloning (redirect page) Argument: Cloning technology is unsafe for the resulting life Argument: Human cloning reduces biological diversity in the human population Past Debate Digest topics Argument: It is a false requirement that clones possess individuality Argument: Human cloning "plays God" less than lauded therapeutic cloning Argument: Cloning is safe enough to perform on humans Argument: Scientists want to create a race of clones to experiment on Argument: Cloning undermines the natural relationship between procreation and family Argument: Cloning plays against God's intentions for reproduction and family Argument: Reproductive cloning undermines human dignity Argument: A cloned human would have a diminished sense of identity/individuality Argument: Reproductive cloning generally diminishes human individualism Argument: Pushing forward with human cloning violates the precautionary principle Argument: Human cloning divorces man from nature and natural processes Argument: The American public opposes human cloning Argument: Cloning leads to the commodification and manufacture of humans Argument: Human cloning is a threat to the environment Argument: Human clones will be seen and treated by some as inferior Argument: While illegal clones should have rights, a ban is still justified Argument: Parents that lose a child should not be assuaged with a cloned baby Argument: It is wrong to legalize cloning to uphold abortion Argument: Reproductive cloning would entail dehumanizing experimentation Argument: Cloning evil people will not result in evil clones Argument: Clones' quality-of-life depends on how they are received/treated Argument: Cloning will not lead to the mass production of clones Argument: Humans have the right to choose to practice cloning Argument: Human cloning will increase inequalities in society Argument: Cloned humans should have equal rights Argument: Human reproductive cloning has been rejected by the United Nations Argument: Human cloning makes individuals replaceable View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 \| 50 \| 100 \| 250 \| 500). Retrieved from "http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Special:Whatlinkshere"

Problem with the site?

.