Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10)
Debate Digest Nov 19th: Medical marijuana. Next Debate Digest article: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts
Debate: Death penalty
From Debatepedia
(List of links)
< Debate: Death penaltyThe following pages link to Debate: Death penalty:
View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).- Resolved: A just society ought not use the death penalty as a form of punishment
- Debate: Death penalty for child rape
- Past featured editors
- Debate:Capital Punishment (redirect page)
- Debatepedia:Marketing
- Debate competitions list
- Argument: The death penalty is proportional punishment/due desert for murder
- Argument: Murderers lose the right to life upon taking another life
- Argument: Public calls for capital punishment must be met to uphold justice
- Argument: Death penalty effectively prevents murderers from killing again
- Argument: Life without parole is not "more compassionate" than capital punishment
- Argument: State-sanctioned executions devalue the dignity of life
- Argument: Wrongful executions cannot be corrected, violating due process
- Argument: Life in prison deters crime/murder as well as the death penalty
- Argument: The ends (deterrence) should not justify means (capital punishment)
- Argument:Capital punishment protects more innocents than it does accidentally take the life of innocent convicts
- Argument: Capital punishment does not allow for repenting as life imprisonment does
- Argument: Life in prison is a greater punishment than the death penalty
- Argument: The death penalty is often motivated by discrimination
- Argument: Capital punishment is void of compassion
- Argument: Due process is all that is required, even if it risks wrongful execution
- Argument: Exoneration from death row is not proof of innocence
- Argument: Mistaken convictions have not translated into wrongful executions
- Argument: Risk of executing innocent people undermines death penalty
- Argument:Race is not a significant factor in capital punishment cases
- Argument: Capital punishment is peformed arbitrarily, violating equal protections
- Argument: The poor are unfairly vulnerable to capital punishment
- Argument: Proportional justice risks justifying extreme punishment such as torture
- Argument: Capital punishment has a deterrent effect on criminal activities
- Argument: Capital punishment does not deter crime
- Argument: Capital punishment does not alleviate the pain of the victim's family and can actually add to it
- Argument: Costs of capital punishment are irrelevant to justice
- Argument: Capital punishment costs more than life without parole
- Argument: Using death penalty to fight crimes distracts from underlying problems
- Argument: Executing criminals rules out the possibility of rehabilitation
- Argument: "He who sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed" (Gen. 9.6) supports executions
- Argument: The Biblical expression an "eye for an eye" is a prescription for proportional justice and capital punishment
- Argument: Capital punishment is supported by the Bible
- User talk:Adam Goldfarb
- Past Debate Digest topics
- User talk:Shredyourfaceoff
- Argument: Death penalty addresses crimes where victim can never be compensated
- Argument: Rejecting calls for capital punishment risks inciting vigilante justice
- Argument: The death penalty is a just means of protecting society
- Argument: The death penalty harms the family of the executed
- Argument: Capital punishment does not bring "closure" to families
- Argument: Society is judged by how it treats prisoners; executions fail test
- Argument: The death penalty violates the inalienable right to life
- Argument: Killing is never justified; the death penalty is no exception
- Argument: Killing in any form victimizes all of humankind
- Argument: The death penalty deters crime if it is a certainty
- Argument: Executions are cruel and unusual punishment, violating human rights
- Argument: Executions have a brutalizing social effect that can increase crime
- Argument: Capital punishment wastes time and energy and burdens courts
- Argument: DNA testing increases assurances of guilt; basis for executions
- Argument: Capital punishment is not "unusual" ("cruel and unusual")
- Argument: Executions punish the guilty so can't encourage killing the innocent
- Argument: The executed guilty cannot be equated with aborted unborn innocent
- Argument: Executions characterize oppressive, undemocratic countries
- Argument: Modern states regulate executions, unlike barbaric executions elsewhere
- Argument: Deterrence is not a necessary pillar of the case for the death penalty
- Argument: The death penalty is about punishment/due desert, not vengeance
- Argument: Capital punishment best prepares an evil soul for the after life
- Argument: "Thou shall not kill" means "thou shall not murder"; executions okay
- Argument: Executions give solace to families; killer will never kill again
- Argument: Capital punishment is not barbaric; it is often a civilized punishment
- Argument: Life in prison is a sufficient punishment; execution is excessive
- Argument: Life imprisonment does not repudiate murder like capital punishment
- Argument: Individuals are executed on murder charges whom deserved manslaughter
- Argument: Opposition to executions is not about sympathizing with murderers
- Argument: The death penalty is barbaric and uncharacteristic of a decent society
- Argument: The death penalty does not advance any social objective
- Argument: Capital punishment is compassionate to the victims
- Argument: The state should simply not be involved in killing people
- Argument: The Catholic Church has long opposed the death penalty
- Argument: Most Catholics now reject the death penalty
- Argument: Murderers forfeit the right to life
- Argument: The death penalty upholds individual responsibility and dignity
- Argument: The death penalty affirms the sanctity of innocent life
- Argument: Society can't show that killing is wrong by killing
- Argument: The death penalty is merely a vehicle for vengeance
- Argument: Executions help society express horror and abhorrence of murder
- Argument: Deterrence accompanying capital punishment varies across the states.
- Argument: The death penalty does not bring back a loved one
- Argument: It is wrong to give a person the job of executing another person
- Argument: Executions respond appropriately to the most heinous crimes
- Argument: Criminals fear death and the death penalty
- Argument: Universal Declaration of Human Rights allows for death penalty
- Argument: Innocent life must be valued over that of a murderer
- Argument: Any discrimination in capital punishment cases can be corrected
- Argument: Executions are no more costly than life in prison
- Argument: The death penalty is not cruel
- Argument: 5th amendment of US Constitution allows for executions
- Argument: Some risk of executing the innocent must be tolerated
- Argument: Jesus' "judge not" does not apply to the death penalty
- Argument: Jesus called for the death penalty in some circumstances
- Argument: It is impossible to determine that deterrence is not working
- Argument: The death penalty helps protect inmates and prison guards
- Argument: Killing by execution is not "murder" and can be justified
- Argument: Executing killers is not comparable to raping rapists
- Argument: Death is more compassionate than life in prison
- Argument: The death penalty does not honor the memory of a loved one
- SEO
- Debatepedia top 25 pro/con articles
- User:Azqwe
- Debate: Death penalty for juveniles
- Debatepedia top 10 pro/con articles
- Debate: Life without parole vs. death penalty



