Debate: Guantanamo Bay detention center - Debatepedia

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

Personal tools

	Views Special Page
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Debate Digest cue Popular debates Newest pages Categories Internships getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Contact Mailing list Twitter Facebook group interactions Donate! NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects Useful links National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox Upload file Special pages	Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10) Debate Digest Nov 19th: Medical marijuana. Next Debate Digest article: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts Debate: Guantanamo Bay detention center From Debatepedia (List of links) Jump to: navigation, search < Debate: Guantanamo Bay detention center The following pages link to Debate: Guantanamo Bay detention center: View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 \| 50 \| 100 \| 250 \| 500). Past Debate Digest topics Debate: Guantanamo Bay (redirect page) Debate:Guantanamo Bay (redirect page) Argument: Conditions at Guantanamo are very good for detainees Argument: There is sufficient review process for detainees at Guantanamo Argument: Guantanamo bay tarnishes the image of the United States Argument: Detainees have a right to due process and protections in US courts Argument: Guantanamo abuses include the desecration of the Koran Argument: Past Cuba-US treaties forbid the current use of Guantanamo Argument: Closing Guantanamo would renew America's image and leadership Argument: Guantanamo bay violates the Geneva convention Argument: Guantanamo detainees have been subjected to human rights abuses Argument: Guantanamo Bay prisoners have no way of proving innocence Argument: Guantanamo bay's existence alienates potential intelligence sources Argument: Guantanamo bay's existence fuels terrorist causes Argument: Guantanamo makes it difficult for US allies to help war on terror Argument: Guantanamo violates habeas corpus, obstructs proof of innocence Argument: US prisons are capable of handling Guantanamo detainees Argument: Terrorist interrogations must be performed, why not at Guantanamo? Argument: Guantanamo should not be closed to placate international opinion Argument: If released, many Guantanamo detainees will return to terrorism Argument: Guantanamo detainees are not being tortured Argument: US definitions of torture do not comply with international definitions Argument: US rejections of UN calls to close Guantanamo look very bad Argument: US conditions on the 2006 UN visit to Guantanamo were inappropriate Argument: The 2006 UN report against Guantanamo was based on sound evidence gathering Argument: The indefinite detention of prisoners for intelligence-gathering is unjust Argument: Some Guantanamo detainees were unjustly captured outside conflict zone Argument: Guantanamo detainees have been tortured Argument: Conditions at Guantanamo Bay are harmful to detainee mental health Argument: Enemy combatants can be held without trial until hostilities cease Past Debate Digest topics Debatepedia top 10 pro/con articles Debatepedia top 25 pro/con articles Argument: Dangerous Guantanamo detainees should be held as POWs Argument: General opinions in favor of closing Guantanamo Bay Argument: Closing Guantanamo renews US moral authority against terrorists Argument: Guantanamo is based on a false choice b/w security and principle Argument: Closing Guantanamo clarifies detention policy in military Arguments: Evidence against terrorists is not always valid in civilian courts Argument: Too many Guantanamo detainees are falsely accused and imprisoned Argument: Released Guantanamo detainees are unlikely to return to terrorism Argument: Enemy combatants receive sufficient judicial process under i-law Argument: Tortured detainees cannot be tried in US, would be released Argument: There is substantial evidence against remaining detainees Argument: Guantanamo is key to information gathering in the war on terror Argument: Conducting detainee trials in the US would endanger US citizens Argument: Preventive detention at Guantanamo trades liberty for security Argument: Closing Guantanamo helps uphold the rule of law internationally Argument: Guantanamo is inconsistent with American principles of justice Argument: US courts can successfully try Guantanamo detainees Argument: That detainees were tortured should not now prevent US trials Argument: Tortured detainees can be successfully tried in US courts Argument: Difficulty closing Guantanamo is fault of Bush for creating it Argument: Closing Guantanamo need not free un-triable, dangerous detainees Argument: US trials of detainees exposes intelligence, weakens security Argument: Closing Guantanamo Bay would embolden terrorists Argument: Unlawful combatants don't have same rights as citizens or soldiers View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 \| 50 \| 100 \| 250 \| 500). Retrieved from "http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Special:Whatlinkshere"

Problem with the site?

.