Debate: Kyoto Protocol - Debatepedia

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

Personal tools

	Views Special Page
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Debate Digest cue Popular debates Newest pages Categories Internships getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Contact Mailing list Twitter Facebook group interactions Donate! NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects Useful links National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox Upload file Special pages	Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10) Debate Digest Nov 19th: Medical marijuana. Next Debate Digest article: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts Debate: Kyoto Protocol From Debatepedia (List of links) Jump to: navigation, search < Debate: Kyoto Protocol The following pages link to Debate: Kyoto Protocol: View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 \| 50 \| 100 \| 250 \| 500). Global climate change debate portal Debate: Developed countries have a higher obligation to combat climate change Debate:Kyoto Protocol (redirect page) Position: US opposition to the Kyoto Protocol International Policy Network Position: The Copenhagen Consensus on Global Warming Argument: Kyoto Protocol conflicts with some international trade agreements Argument: Kyoto gains support in the 2005 Montreal Conference National Resource Defense Council American Council for Capital Formation Argument: Kyoto Protocol wrongly exempts heavy-emitting developing nations Argument: US population growth increased energy demand; Kyoto is impractical Argument: The Kyoto Protocol's emissions targets are economically reasonable Argument: Industrialized countries cannot economically afford to meet Kyoto's targets Position: Al Gore opposed the Kyoto protocol in 1997 Position: Friends of the Earth sued the Canadian government for allegedly withdrawing from commitments to Kyoto Argument: The Kyoto protocol would harm the American economy Argument: Costs of Kyoto are less than environmental-economic costs of inaction Argument: The Kyoto Protocol stimulates new industries Argument: Kyoto Protocol cannot significantly cut emissions without US Argument: The Kyoto Protocol's target cuts in emissions are achievable Argument: The Kyoto Protocol is showing little progress in reducing emissions Past Debate Digest topics Argument: The US is (wrongly) the only industrial economy to oppose Kyoto Argument: Voluntary emissions schemes do not effectively cut emissions Argument: Humans are not causing global warming so Kyoto can't solve it Argument: US has a responsibility to lead on climate change and in Kyoto Argument: Kyoto Protocol violates national sovereignty and controls Argument: Kyoto Protocol employs inefficient government controls Argument: Countries must work together under Kyoto to combat global warming Argument: The Kyoto Protocol entails serious economic costs for signatories Argument: Kyoto would only benefit the global warming establishment Argument: Kyoto is an important first step in the right direction Argument: Opposition to Kyoto strains US image in the world Argument: Voluntary emissions reduction schemes have low participation levels Argument: Kyoto is too difficult to implement; won't cut emissions Argument: Kyoto makes insufficient emission cuts to fight global warming Argument: The Kyoto Protocol is not very expandable Argument: Kyoto regulations on C02 emissions do not improve air-quality Argument: Regulating C02 is wrong approach; market investments are better Argument: The Kyoto Protocol's emissions targets are unrealistic Argument: Industrial countries caused global warming so should carry burden Argument: General statements of support for the Kyoto Protocol SEO View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 \| 50 \| 100 \| 250 \| 500). Retrieved from "http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Special:Whatlinkshere"

Problem with the site?

.