Debate: Male infant circumcision - Debatepedia

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

Personal tools

	Views Special Page
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Debate Digest cue Popular debates Newest pages Categories Internships getting started User Guide Create a debate Create an argument Pro/con structure Contact Mailing list Twitter Facebook group interactions Donate! NFL resolution topics Other IDEA projects Useful links National Debate Series: Boston In other languages Toolbox Upload file Special pages	Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10) Debate Digest Nov 19th: Medical marijuana. Next Debate Digest article: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts Debate: Male infant circumcision From Debatepedia (List of links) Jump to: navigation, search < Debate: Male infant circumcision The following pages link to Debate: Male infant circumcision: View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 \| 50 \| 100 \| 250 \| 500). Debate: Male circumcision (redirect page) Past Debate Digest topics Argument: Circumcision does not interfere with sexual performance Debate: Circumcision (redirect page) Debate:Circumcision (redirect page) Argument: Complications from circumcision stem only from faulty surgery Argument: Non-circumcision can result in many complications Argument: Circumcision reduces the risk of HIV infection Argument: Circumcision is a malicious tool for discouraging masturbation Argument: Ideologies drive false medical justifications for circumcision Argument: The foreskin is a brilliant product of human evolution Argument: Circumcision eliminates foreskin's many protective functions Argument: Foreskin is important to sexual intercourse and pleasure Argument: Circumcision always risks permanent injury and disfigurement Argument: Circumcised babies can require more motherly care Argument: Circumcision violates infant's right to informed consent Argument: Circumcision violates the trust between parent and child Argument: Circumcision was used to reduce fertility of certain groups Argument: The natural penis is clean and requires no special care Argument: Myth: circumcision is necessary later if not done at birth Argument: Uncircumcised men often pass infections/diseases to spouses Argument: Circumcision can cause hemorrhaging and death Argument: Circumcision creates risk of infections in infants Argument: Circumcision can result in a "concealed penis" Argument: Circumcision is not a good solution to phimosis of foreskin Argument: Circumcision can cause urinary retention in infants Argument: Circumcisions often remove too much foreskin Argument: Circumcision can cause sleep apnea in infants Argument: Circumcision wrongly inflicts severe pain on infants Argument: Circumcision entails risk of pulmonary embolism Argument: Dangerous cultural pressure exists surrounding circumcision Argument: Faulty circumcision can result in loss of penis Argument: Circumcision does not have sufficient medical justifications Argument: No right to impose religious belief in circumcision on child Argument: Circumcision helps protect against cancer of the penis Argument: General statements of opposition to circumcision Argument: HIV-prevention is poor justification for neonatal circumcision Argument: Pain of circumcision is traumatizing for infants Argument: Neonatal circumcision violates right to avoid inflicted pain Argument: Parents lack right to choose non-therapeutic circumcision Argument: Hippocratic oath obligates doctors to avoid circumcision Argument: Parents have a right to circumcise their children Argument: Circumcision helps prevent balantis in the penis Argument: Women prefer cleaner circumcised penis Argument: Circumcision increases sexual stamina and satisfaction Argument: Opponents of circumcision have adopted nefarious tactics Argument: Circumcision helps prevent phimosis Argument: Circumcision helps protect against kidney infections Argument: Circumcision is akin to legal vaccination of infants Argument: The uncircumcised often suffer from penis infections Argument: Circumcision reduces risk of urinary tract infections Argument: Circumcision does not interfere with sexual pleasure Argument: Pain relief for neonatal circumcision does not make it OK Argument: Women preferring circumcised men suffer from cultural ills Argument: The circumcised perpetuate the practice in a form of denial Argument: Neonatal circumcision violates the right to bodily integrity Argument: Crying of circumcised babies can cause complications Argument: Circumcised foreskin can be used to combat facial aging Argument: Circumcised and uncircumcised men have statistical equal stamina Argument: Circumcision discourages masturbation by making it less pleasurable Argument: Circumcision can cause male impotency Argument: Circumcision improves a man's sense of confidence Argument: Those circumcised in adulthood note improved sex Argument: Women are more likely to orgasm with circumcised men Argument: Circumcision results in enlargement of gland, enjoyed by women Argument: Lower sensitivity of circumcised penis reduces condom-use View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 \| 50 \| 100 \| 250 \| 500). Retrieved from "http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Special:Whatlinkshere"

Problem with the site?

.