Debatepedia partners with The People Speak Global Debates and the The National Debate Series: Boston (Nov. 10)
Debate Digest Nov 19th: Medical marijuana. Next Debate Digest article: Trying 9/11 terror suspects in NYC courts
Debate: UN Security Council veto
From Debatepedia
(List of links)
< Debate: UN Security Council vetoThe following pages link to Debate: UN Security Council veto:
View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).- Debate:UN Security Council Veto (redirect page)
- Past Debate Digest topics
- Argument: Vietnam supports banning UN security council veto power
- Argument: Veto power is frequently hijacked by national agendas
- Argument: The UN SC veto violates democratic principal of sovereign equality
- Argument: Veto power undermines the moral stature of the UN
- Argument: The United States unjustly protects Israel with UN veto
- Argument: The UN Security Council Veto is unreflective of geopolitical realities
- Argument: Abolishing veto would enable more global action in the UN
- Argument: UN veto harms US interests more than it benefits them
- Argument: Germany should receive UN Security Council veto power
- Argument: The "hidden veto" threat in the UN is disruptive
- Argument: UN SC vetoes can be bypassed with "Uniting for Peace" Resolution
- Argument: "Uniting for Peace" Resolutions to bypass UN vetoes are only symbolic
- Argument: UN veto is being abused to stymie country admissions to UN
- Argument: Extending UN SC veto to more countries would reduce UN effectiveness
- Argument: Abandoning UN SC veto to constrain the US would be wrong
- Argument: Voluntary limitations of UN SC veto to only enforcement would not work
- Argument: UN reform will not solve problem of states acting in self interest
- Argument: Abolishing UN SC veto won't solve broader problems in UN SC
- Argument: The UN SC veto is justifiably given to nuclear powers
- Argument: Australia doesn't deserve a UN SC veto
- Argument: Vast majority of General Assembly wants to end UN SC veto power
- Argument: The UN Security Council veto perpetuates differences and animosity
- Argument: The General Assembly should be able to overrule a UN SC veto
- Argument: P-5 veto encourages strongest states to work inside not outside the system
- Argument: P-5 veto ensures measures aren't passed that UN can't fulfill
- Argument: The UN Charter does not offer sovereign equality
- Argument: P-5 veto rewards the disproportionate contribution to global security
- Argument: The UN veto fosters a system of checks and balances
- Argument: The UN veto is not consistent with principles of checks and balances
- Argument: P-5 countries will not allow the abolition of their UN SC vetoes
- Argument: The UN veto is anachronistic
- Argument: UN veto causes perceptions of the UN as a tool of the West
- Argument: UN veto perpetuates unfortunate geopolitical games
