Argument:Hosting the Olympics stimulates regeneration, investment, and long-term economic benefits - Debatepedia

Welcome to Debatepedia! | About | Help | FAQ | Media Kit

Personal tools

	Views Article Discussion Edit History
Search Navigation Debatepedia Home IDEA Home Recent Changes Browse categories All debates Popular debates Active editors Community forum Mailing list Summer internships getting started How to edit Editing tasks Create a debate page Suggest a debate Manipulate debates Create argument pages Post videos Volunteer! interactions Daily Debate calendar Make the case Become an administrator Contact Donate! Affiliates and links in other languages العربية [ar] Español [es] Français [fr] Magyar [hu] Nederlands [nl] Romanian [ro] Русский [ru] Српски [sr] Nepali [np] other idea projects IDEA Standards Debatabase Discussion Boards DebateTracker IDEA Encyclomedia IDEA Blog Citizen Journalism IDEA News IDEA Events My Debate Teaching Resources Publications Join IDEA Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Printable version Permanent link	Debatepedia launches a Global Warming Debates Portal for The People Speak Global Debates, a UN Foundation initiative. Argument:Hosting the Olympics stimulates regeneration, investment, and long-term economic benefits From Debatepedia Jump to: navigation, search [] Supporting evidence "The Economic Impact of Hosting the 1996 Summer Olympics". Jeffrey M. Humphreys and Michael K. Plummer. Click edit and add more supporting evidence, quotes, articles, and links here Retrieved from "http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php/Argument:Hosting_the_Olympics_stimulates_regeneration%2C_investment%2C_and_long-term_economic_benefits"

.