See Debatepedia's Global Climate Change Debate Series with the UN Foundation's The People Speak. Press release.
Debate:Priestly Celibacy
From Debatepedia
|
[  ][  ][  ][  ][  ]Should Catholic priests still be required to take a vow of celibacy? |
|
|
[ ][  ][  ][  ][  ]Argument #1 | |
|
[  ][ ]YesUntil 1139, Priests in the Western church were permitted to marry. The Bible does not mandate celibacy and, in fact, St Peter, the first pope, was married. The true history and traditions of the Roman Catholic Church include the option for priests to marry. |
[ ][ ]NoThe earliest church fathers, including St Augustine, supported the celibate priesthood. In the fourth century, church councils enacted legislation forbidding married men who were ordained from having conjugal relations with their wives. We do not know if any of the apostles, other than Peter, were married, but we do know that they gave up everything to follow Jesus. More important, Jesus led a celibate life. |
|
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][  ]Argument #2 | |
|
[ ][ ]YesThe number of priests in America, and in most other developed countries, is on the decline. As a result many parishes are without a priest. The prohibition on marriage pushes some men away from the priesthood. The requirement of celibacy drastically reduces the pool from which the church can select priests and means that the church is not always getting the “best and the brightest”. |
[ ][ ]NoProtestant churches, which do not require celibacy, are also having problems recruiting clergy. Worldwide, the number of new priests is increasing. Only the developed world has seen a decline in priestly vocations, although even here devout countries such as Poland buck the trend. A recent study showed that vocations were on the rise in dioceses in the USA that were loyal to the teachings of the church, including priestly celibacy. |
|
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]Argument #3 | |
|
[ ][ ]YesProtestant clergy, for example in the Episcopal church which has similar parish structures to Roman Catholicism, successfully balance their work in the church and their families. Were priests permitted to marry and have families, their families could serve as examples to others. In addition, marriage can provide a priest with increased social support and intimacy. Too many priests burn out through overwork and stress, having no one at home to support them and tell them its time to stop working. |
[ ][ ]NoA celibate priest can devote all his time to his parishioners. A married priest must spend time with his family. Protestant clergy have balanced their work for the church with their family responsibilities only with difficulty. Many wives and families of Protestant clergy report feeling second to the congregation. |
|
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]Argument #4 | |
|
[ ][ ]YesPriestly celibacy is outdated. It sets the priest apart from the modern world and the experiences of his parishioners. Originally, around 1100 the Gregorian Reform movement in the church was keen to enforce celibacy for fear that too many married priests would leave church property to their children, or create local priestly dynasties. At the time these fears were reasonable and necessary to maintain the property and discipline of the church, but today they are utterly unnecessary. |
[ ][ ]NoThe priest is set apart from the world. He has a unique role: he represents Christ to his parishioners. Just as Jesus led a life of chastity dedicated to God, so a priest must offer his life to God’s people. |
|
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]Argument #5 | |
|
[ ][ ]YesCelibate priests can never experience the intimate and complicated marital relationship. They lack credibility when conducting marriage and family counselling. Married priests can better serve their parishioners because of their marital and family experiences. |
[ ][ ]NoThe celibate priest has a unique understanding of the power of self-control and the giving of self, which are key ideas in marriage. The priest is married to the church and can counsel couples and families using that knowledge. |
|
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]Argument #6 | |
|
[ ][ ]YesThe prospect of celibacy draws sexually dysfunctional men to the priesthood. They hope that by totally denying their sexuality, they will not engage in pedophilia, but unfortunately they often cannot overcome their deviant desires. Permitting priests to marry would bring men with healthy sexual desires to the priesthood. |
[ ][ ]NoCelibacy and pedophilia are not connected. Sexual abuse also occurs in religions where clergy are permitted to marry. Studies have shown that sexual abusers account for less than 2% of Roman Catholic clergy, a figure comparable to clergy in other denominations, or to the wider male population as a whole. |
|
[ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]Argument #7 | |
|
[ ][ ]YesThe insistence on priestly celibacy is one of the major stumbling blocks to church unity. Discussions with the Orthodox church (which has always allowed married priests) and protestant denominations such as the Episcopal (Anglican) church often founder on the different conception of priesthood held by the Catholic church. Yet there is a precedent for allowing married priests - in the 1990s when British Anglican priests who could not accept women priests left the Church of England to become Catholics, they were allowed to serve as Catholic priests despite being married. Changing the rule more generally would make ecumenical dialogue more possible and open the way to the healing of historic schisms in the body of Christ. |
[ ][ ]No7. The Catholic church should not bend its principles for the sake of expediency. Many more issues divide Roman Catholicism from other churches (e.g. the authority of the Pope, the nature of the sacrament, even the wording of the creed). If the church accepted this change for the sake of convenience, where would it stop? Should women also be allowed to become priests? What about practising homosexuals? More likely such a compromise would see a further split in the church, as those who upheld traditional Catholic teaching rejected the change. Look how the Episcopal (Anglican) church is falling apart over the ordination of gay priests and women bishops. In any case, allowing priests to marry would undoubtedly lead to a two-class priesthood, with many good Catholics continuing to feel that clergy who continue to choose celibacy are superior to those who reject it. That would hardly be a healthy development for the unity of the church or for the authority of the priesthood. |
|
[ ]References:[ ]Motions
[ ]In legislation, policy, and the world[ ]See also on Debatepedia:[ ]External links and resources:
[ ]Books
| |