See Debatepedia's Global Climate Change Debate Series with the UN Foundation's The People Speak. Press release.

From Debatepedia

(Newest | Oldest) View (Newer 50) (Older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).

• 23:30, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→Yes)
• 23:26, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→Yes)
• 23:24, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→Yes)
• 23:23, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA
• 23:17, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→Yes)
• 23:16, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→Yes)
• 23:15, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Argument: Economic liberalisation doesn't necessarily cause democratic progression
• 23:13, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→Yes)
• 23:12, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→Yes)
• 23:10, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→Democratic process: Is NAFTA with consistent democratic processes?)
• 23:08, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Argument:How far can economic liberalisation create democratic progression (→Supporting Evidence and Articles) (top)
• 23:07, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Argument:How far can economic liberalisation create democratic progression
• 23:05, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→Yes)
• 23:00, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Argument:NAFTA has made Mexico more democratic in both the corporate and public worlds (→Supporting Evidence and Articles) (top)
• 22:59, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→Yes)
• 22:57, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Argument:NAFTA has made Mexico more democratic in both the corporate and public worlds (really good paper on reach of economic liberalisation)
• 22:49, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→Yes)
• 22:45, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Argument: NAFTA helps states recover from crisis (i.e. Peso crisis) (→Evidence)
• 22:44, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Argument: NAFTA helps states recover from crisis (i.e. Peso crisis) (→Evidence)
• 22:43, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Argument: NAFTA helps states recover from crisis (i.e. Peso crisis)
• 22:41, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→Yes)
• 22:37, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Argument: NAFTA has created greater demand for all companies products by creating demand: (top)
• 22:34, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Argument:NAFTA has caused job loss in America (→Parent debate(s)) (top)
• 22:33, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→Yes)
• 22:26, 28 June 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Brooks Lindsay (Assigned task on user page?)
• 20:22, 26 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→Yes)
• 20:20, 26 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→No)
• 20:11, 26 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→References:)
• 20:10, 26 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→References:)
• 20:07, 26 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→Yes)
• 20:07, 26 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→Yes)
• 19:58, 26 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→Yes)
• 19:57, 26 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→Yes)
• 19:53, 26 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→No)
• 19:45, 26 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→No)
• 19:43, 26 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→No)
• 19:39, 26 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→No)
• 19:38, 26 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→No)
• 19:35, 26 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→No)
• 19:35, 26 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→No)
• 19:21, 26 June 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:NAFTA (→Background and Context of Debate:)
• 20:44, 8 April 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:Reducing value added tax (VAT) on contraceptives (→No) (top)
• 20:36, 8 April 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:Reducing value added tax (VAT) on contraceptives (→No)
• 20:35, 8 April 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:Reducing value added tax (VAT) on contraceptives (→No)
• 23:56, 25 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:Reducing value added tax (VAT) on contraceptives (→No)
• 23:48, 25 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:Reducing value added tax (VAT) on contraceptives (→'''Will cheaper contraceptives stop issues like teenage pregnancy''')
• 23:45, 25 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:Reducing value added tax (VAT) on contraceptives (→No)
• 23:41, 25 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:Reducing value added tax (VAT) on contraceptives (→No)
• 23:40, 25 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:Reducing value added tax (VAT) on contraceptives (→No)
• 23:32, 25 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Debate:Reducing value added tax (VAT) on contraceptives (→Yes)

(Newest | Oldest) View (Newer 50) (Older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).